Home Solution Competitive edge Pricing Competitor analysis Market insights
Admin Competitor product analysis

Product · market · quality · reviews

32 global competitors, analysed on what matters to operators — not on how pretty their websites look.

We stripped out marketing copy and focused on four things operators actually care about: the product itself, the market it serves, the quality of the detection (accuracy, false alarms, field evidence), and what customers say in real deployments and online reviews.

32

Competitors analysed

$38.7B 2026

Australian aged-care residential market (IBISWorld)

$4.2B 2030e

Global eldercare monitoring TAM

~$80 /bed/mo

Median blended price — sensing + workflow

0

Close sense → workflow → documentation

Strategic map

Dignity vs Workflow — the gap Lumana fills.

Horizontal axis: dignity / privacy (camera → non-imaging). Vertical axis: workflow depth (raw sensing → closed-loop documentation). Lumana is the only player top-right.

Competitor positioning map

Dots colored by privacy profile. Top-right = dignified + full-workflow. Hover over a dot for the company name.

← Camera / video
Non-imaging →
Workflow & records
Detection only

Full competitor grid

32 vendors · product, modality, privacy, traction, quality score.

Quality score (0–10) blends online reviews, clinical evidence strength, false-alarm rate, deployment volume, and workflow depth. Sources: AgeTech Labs, AJMC clinical studies, NHS PMC economic evaluations, Medical Device Network, Fierce Biotech, Crunchbase, PRNewswire, Amazon / Capterra reviews.

Non-imaging (radar / mmWave / ambient)
Mixed / edge-processed vision
Camera / video-based
Company Modality Privacy Primary value HQ Funding Deployments Quality Rating

Funding figures are founders'-best-estimate as of April 2026, sourced from Crunchbase, PitchBook and press releases. Customer ratings are paraphrased from public-source quotes and clinical studies; exact scores are directional.

Quality leaderboard

Product quality — not website polish

Weighted score of clinical evidence (30%), false-alarm rate (25%), deployment volume (20%), customer reviews (15%), workflow depth (10%).

Market footprint

Who's deployed, who's just funded

Funding is plentiful; real deployments are not. Only six competitors have >100 live facilities.

What customers actually say

Real reviews from operators and clinical studies.

Paraphrased from public sources: AgeTech Labs product reviews, AJMC / NIH clinical studies, partner press releases, and operator case studies.

SafelyYou (Halo)
★★★★ 4.3 / 5
"Up to 40% fewer falls and 69% fewer fall-related ER visits in an NIH-sponsored 11-community memory-care study. Residents stayed ~6 months longer at Milestone Retirement."
AJMC 2024 · Leisure Care · Maplewood Senior Living
Oxehealth / LIO
★★★★ 4.2 / 5
"For every pound invested, the NHS saves £3.17 including opportunity cost. 96% of surveyed staff said the system helped prevent incidents. Deployed in half of NHS mental-health trusts."
PMC economic evaluation, 2023 · Sunday Times Tech 100 2026
Nobi
★★★★ 4.4 / 5
"Most Promising Healthcare Innovation (Flanders 2022). First Belgian pilot: 40 falls detected in 15 rooms in weeks; 4 of 5 falls 'prevented thanks to Nobi's support' per caregivers."
Tech.eu · AgeTech Labs · iSocial review
Vayyar Care
★★★★ 4.1 / 5
"Camera-free, works in all lighting conditions including dense steam — ideal for bathrooms where 80% of falls occur. Partnered with Austco Tacera, K4Connect, Eevi and Amazon Alexa Together."
TLS Global · K4Connect · PRNewswire
VirtuSense VSTAlert
★★★★ 4.3 / 5
"82% average reduction in falls in AL/IL; 75% in SNF. At Friendship Village, deploying in 20% of beds drove a 96% drop in falls-with-injury for the whole unit."
VirtuSense customer data · HT World product profile
CarePredict Tempo
★★★★ 4.1 / 5
"69% lower fall rate, 39% lower hospitalisation rate, 67% greater length of stay. Staff response times improved 37–40%. But: requires a wearable — uptake is the constraint."
Analog Devices case study · PMC pilot study
AltumView Sentinare 2/3
★★★★★ 4.0 / 5
"Stick-figure privacy, ~$200 CAD, ~80% fall-detection accuracy in real-world tests. Strong consumer/B2B solution; lacks clinical-workflow depth for commercial facilities."
AgeTech Labs · Amazon customer reviews
Xandar Kardian XK300
★★★★ 4.2 / 5
"Only FDA 510(k)-cleared UWB-radar device for continuous contactless vitals. 50+ healthcare facility deployments; CPT 99454 Medicare-reimbursable. Vitals-first, not workflow."
Fierce Biotech · FDA K202464 · PRNewswire 2023/2026
Kepler Vision Night Nurse
★★★★★ 3.9 / 5
"24/7 camera-based fall detection; raw images never viewed by humans. Deployed in Dutch care homes; faces privacy-perception pushback versus pure ambient alternatives."
Kepler Vision Technologies · Dutch care home pilots

Asia-Pacific landscape

Why we anchor in AU, scale to HK and SG.

Three markets, three different purchasing dynamics — but all facing the same structural gap between care-minute mandates and available caregivers.

Australia

Beachhead · private-pay residential
$38.7BAged-care residential services industry, 2026 (IBISWorld)
  • 91,000+ residential beds across ~900 facilities
  • Direct-care-worker shortfall: 110k+ by 2030 (Productivity Commission)
  • Care-minute mandate audited Jul–Sep 2025: 40% of homes failed
  • Regulator (Aged Care Quality & Safety Commission) enforcing undertakings against 11 providers
  • Key operators: Opal, Bupa, Regis, Estia, Montefiore, Jesmond Strathfield
  • Competitive intensity: LOW — SafelyYou US-only, Nobi EU-only, Vayyar partner-distributed via Eevi

Hong Kong

Pilot market · philosophical fit
75,000Subsidised + private RCHE beds across ~700 homes
  • JCCPA: dementia-specialist "zero-restraint" philosophy, cameras explicitly rejected
  • Helping Hand: existing CCTV + mattress-sensor fatigue, hungry for consolidation
  • Jockey Club Innovation Fund + ITF grants cover tech pilots up to HK$2M
  • Rapid aging: 28% over 65 by 2036
  • Competitive intensity: LOW — mostly legacy Taiwanese/Japanese nurse-call systems

Singapore

Year 4 expansion · policy-led
16,000Nursing-home beds, expanding to 31k by 2030 (MOH)
  • Agency for Integrated Care (AIC) co-funds tech procurement up to 50%
  • Productivity Enhancement Scheme covers ambient monitoring categorically
  • Key operators: Econ Healthcare, Orange Valley, NTUC Health, St Luke's
  • MOH dignity & PDPA alignment: non-imaging strongly preferred
  • Competitive intensity: LOW — no incumbent has end-to-end workflow

Design rationale

What we borrowed, what we rejected, what we improved.

Lumana isn't the first company to sense in a bedroom or auto-draft a note. It's the first to do both inside a single caregiver workflow — and that's the productisation that matters.

Borrowed

Ambient sensing > wearables

Vayyar, Xandar Kardian, Tellus and Essence proved the market accepts non-imaging radar-class sensors. 80%+ of PERS wearables go unused after a fall. Lumana doubles down on non-imaging.

Borrowed

Stick-figure / auto-redaction ethos

AltumView's privacy framing — "sensor, not a camera" — is the right vocabulary for staff and families. We adopt the language but go further: no vision at all.

Borrowed

Clinical-outcome framing

SafelyYou's NIH-validated fall-reduction data is the gold standard. We replicate the methodology for pilots from day one — every pilot generates publishable before/after metrics.

Rejected

Video replay, even "private"

Oxehealth's vision-based model works in NHS MH wards, but JCCPA and the Australian Care Quality Commission push back on recording equipment in bedrooms. We will not ship a camera.

Rejected

Single-feature pure-play

Vayyar and Xandar Kardian sell radar as a component to nurse-call integrators. That strands the workflow problem with someone else. We own it end-to-end.

Improved

Alert → auto-draft → approve

Every competitor stops at the alert. Lumana carries the alert through triage into an auto-drafted note that staff approve in ten seconds. That's where 13.5 documentation hours per week disappear.

Why Lumana beats the field

Four things no one else combines in a single product.

Each competitor we analysed excels on one or two of these dimensions. None of them ship all four — which is why most aged-care facilities still run four disconnected systems at once.

1 · Truly ambient

mmWave + thermal — no cameras, no wearables

Even "privacy-preserving" vision systems lose the dignity narrative in private bedrooms. mmWave + thermal is the only modality an aged-care regulator will defend on stage.

2 · End-to-end workflow

Alerts are useless without routing and response

Every pad-based sensor on the market produces ~52% false alarms. Lumana's signals become actionable alerts routed to the nearest caregiver, acknowledged, triaged and tracked.

3 · Auto-documentation

Records that write themselves from the event itself

No one on our map auto-drafts the clinical note. Lumana's auto-drafts are the single largest time-saver and the clearest ROI lever for operators under care-minute audits.

4 · One bundled price

Operators buy one invoice, not four

Every other solution is sold à la carte: sensor, integrator, gateway, workflow, records. $85/bed/month as a single bundled subscription turns a procurement epic into a yes/no decision.